Gerber
4♣ is Gerber always and only:
- when the bid is an immediate response to a natural NT bid by partner.
Responses to 4♣ (Gerber)
| Response | Aces |
|---|---|
| 4♦ | 0 or 4 |
| 4♥ | 1 |
| 4♠ | 2 |
| 4NT | 3 |
Ditto responses at the 5 level to a subsequent 5♣ (Gerber asking for kings);
Examples
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1NT | - | 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1♣ | - | 1♠ | - |
| 2NT | 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1♣ | - | 2♣ 1 | - |
| 3NT | 4♣2 |
1 inverted minor (strong)
2 Gerber. The cost of a simple definition is that Gerber may apply when you prefer it did not.
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1♣ | - | 1NT/2NT/3NT | - |
| 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1♣ | - | 1♥ | - |
| 1♠ | 3NT | ||
| 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1♠ | 3♦ | 3NT | - |
| 4♣ 1 |
1 Gerber (like it or not)
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1NT | - | 2♣ 1 | - |
| 2♥ | 4♣2 |
1 Stayman
2 not Gerber. Presumably a slam-interested splinter with heart match.
Notes
- The simple definition has the benefit of removing any risk of ambiguity, but may create situations where a preferred natural 4♣ is lost.
- Bridgebums page is confusing. The 2 bulleted definitons are alternate definitions (ie either or, not both!)
- a quantative invite can be more helpful than Gerber