Gerber
4♣ is Gerber always and only:
- when the bid is an immediate response to a natural NT bid by partner.
Responses to 4♣ (Gerber)
Response | Aces |
---|---|
4♦ | 0 or 4 |
4♥ | 1 |
4♠ | 2 |
4NT | 3 |
Ditto responses at the 5 level to a subsequent 5♣ (Gerber asking for kings);
Examples
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1NT | - | 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♣ | - | 1♠ | - |
2NT | 4♣1 |
1 Gerber
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♣ | - | 2♣ 1 | - |
3NT | 4♣2 |
1 inverted minor (strong)
2 Gerber. The cost of a simple definition is that Gerber may apply when you prefer it did not.
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♣ | - | 1NT/2NT/3NT | - |
4♣1 |
1 Gerber
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♣ | - | 1♥ | - |
1♠ | 3NT | ||
4♣1 |
1 Gerber
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♠ | 3♦ | 3NT | - |
4♣ 1 |
1 Gerber (like it or not)
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1NT | - | 2♣ 1 | - |
2♥ | 4♣2 |
1 Stayman
2 not Gerber. Presumably a slam-interested splinter with heart match.
Notes
- The simple definition has the benefit of removing any risk of ambiguity, but may create situations where a preferred natural 4♣ is lost.
- Bridgebums page is confusing. The 2 bulleted definitons are alternate definitions (ie either or, not both!)
- a quantative invite can be more helpful than Gerber